The Synod of Udayamperoor
(June 20 - 26 -1599)
The St. Thomas Christians
were very keen to keep
communion with the Chaldeans.
They were against any move to
break this communion. But this
does not mean they were not in
communion with Rome. Communion
with Rome and with the East
Syrian Church could go
together.
Mar Abraham had solicited
the Jesuits to appoint the
Archdeacon as his successor.
They did not oblige..21 22
They wanted to appoint a Latin
bishop over the St. Thomas
Christians and bring them
under the Padroado
jurisdiction.
Archbishop Menezes of Goa
had obtained from Pope Clement
VIII authorization to appoint
a vicar apostolic for Angamali
after the death of Mar
Abraham. Archbishop Menezes
who rushed to Angamaly had to
confirm the Archdeacon George
of thew cross as the
administrator. Menezes
ordained priests to muster
support and convoked a Synod
at Diamper. Studies have
revealed that the Synod was
totally manipulated by the
Archbishop. Menezes composed
in anticipation the Acts of
the Synod in Portuguese and
got it translated into
Malayalam. However this
Portuguese text was very much
different from the Malayalam
text used for collecting the
signature. The Portuguese
manuscript is almost twice as
long as the Malayalam one.
In Europe much publicity
was given to the story of the
Synod of Diamper. The
literature published in this
connection together with what
was said to be the Acts of the
Synod spread the false idea
that for more than thousand
years St. Thomas Christians
had been living out of the
Roman communion, and that they
have been “reduced ” ((brought
back)to the obedience of Rome
by the efforts of the zealous
Archbishop Menezes. Even today
many do not know that St.
Thomas Christians have always
remained faithful and loyal to
Rome for twenty centuries In
place of “Reducing the St.
Thomas Christians to the
obedience of Rome ” Menezes
should have written the
truth,, namely, he removed the
St. Thomas Christians from
under the jurisdiction of the
East Syrian prelates and
brought them under the Latin
jurisdiction and the
Portuguese Padroado. The false
propaganda has done permanent
damage to the St. Thomas
Christians. These
manipulations have gone to
creating animosity between the
two communities.
Two Jesuit Fathers, Ros S.J
who became bishop, and Campori
S.J., who were present in the
Synod, wrote to the Jesuit
General that the Synod was not
“in forma ”.According to their
letters the St. Thomas
Christians were not consulted
in the Synod; they understood
nothing of what was decided
upon there. Precomposed
regulations were read out
which according to Archbishop
Menezes, was done to avoid any
hindrance to show the way of
salvation to the assembled.
Menezes made additions to the
acts of the Synod after the
Synod was over. Menezes
obtained from Ros S.J. the
signatures of the assembled
detached from the original and
attached them to the copy he
prepared to be sent to Rome
for approval.
Though Archbishop Menezes
succeeded in establishing
Latin hegemony and the
Portuguese Padroado over the
St. Thomas Christians, the
Latin prelates and
Latinization were never
accepted by the Thomas
Christians. |